Thursday, January 30, 2014

Current Popular Topics in Youth Sport Safety

Taking inspiration of the recent State of Union Address I thought I would take some time to scour the Internet to see what types of things are brewing in the area of youth sport safety.  As always, concussions at all levels are a hot topic, but what else has happened in recent weeks that you might have missed?
 
Padded Caps Approved for MLB Pitchers
This has been a widely reported story in recent days.  I applaud MLBs efforts to address a growing problem in professional baseball.  If pitchers make the decision to wear the caps (it’s currently optional) it may protect them from hits directly to the front and side of the head.  I do have concerns that it may provide a false sense of security given the fact that it does not protect the face, jaw or ear region of the head and face.  Some of the most severe injuries of late resulted in hits to the head in the ear area; a region not currently protected by the new cap.  Perhaps this is the first step to face shields at all levels of baseball.

Councilman Levin has proposed legislation that will require a physician and/or athletic trainer be available at all youth football games and full contact practices for teams that use Department of Education or Parks and Recreation fields in New York City.  The leagues impacted by the legislation would be PSAL, Catholic High School League and Pop Warner.  The proposal has been supported by the New York State Athletic Trainers’ Association (NYSATA).  I hope this move is the beginning of mandating necessary coverage with all youth sport leagues around the country.

Recent research from the University of Washington shows that young girls often continue to player soccer through concussion symptoms.  Additionally, many of them did not seek evaluation, even after the match concluded.  It’s not just young football players who want to continue to play after suffering a concussion, you must be diligent with all youth sports.

Sports at a young age are supposed to be about fun and learning sport and life skills, but Friday Night Tykes is quite the opposite.  The growing concerns regarding the culture and behaviors chronicled in the show continues.  The concern has grown to such a level that the National Athletic Trainers’ Association has issued an official statement regarding the show and its disregard for player safety.

Supported by the Sports Legacy Institute, Hit Count® is a program that utilizes impact sensors to track the number of hits a player receives in any given game or practice.  If a player receives a certain number of hits (20G force or greater of linear acceleration) they would be removed from play.  There are some concerns whether the program is realistic given the cost to implement the program.  Also, can it be implemented in non-helmet sports such as soccer?

Efforts continue to find an appropriate and fiscally reasonable test that could be included as part of a typical sports pre-participation physical to detect potentially fatal heart conditions.  The intention would be to reduce the incidence of SCA in young athletes.

A recent anonymous survey of over 200 players shows that players are more concerned with sustaining a knee or leg injury since it is seen as potentially more immediately career end than suffering a concussion.  This is despite the available information that continues to demonstrate the long-term effects of suffering repeated concussions.

Submitted by Heather L. Clemons, MS, MBA, ATC

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

How Does your School Stack Up on Sport Safety?

The intention of this week’s post is to help parents understand how to assess their child’s school sports safety program.  The focus will be on high schools, since most legislation and policy standards focus on school sponsored activities.  This doesn’t mean that you should not hold your youth league organizations to the same standard, but it just means they may not be held to the same legal standards depending on the legislation on record in your state.  There are a variety of resources and programs that can give you a glimpse into various programs that can help parents.  I will highlight the NATA’s Safe School’s Program and policy resources available via the Korey Stringer Institute.  I selected these organizations because I believe they provide the most useful information in one place, making it easier for parents to access as much information as possible with as little searching as possible.


KOREY STRINGER INSTITUTE RESOURCES:
 
KSI, led by Executive Director Doug Casa, PhD, ATC, FACSM, FNATA (check out his previous blog feature), is focused on policy-making, education, research and advocacy in the area of preventing sudden death in athletics.  A particular area of expertise for KSI is exertional heat illness (EHI), but time is spent addressing other conditions that could lead to sudden death (Just check out their education and research tabs).  As part of the policy-making arm KSI has developed a series of policy recommendations for states when trying to make youth (especially HS) sports safer.  KSI has taken the time to create graphics that can help you understand whether or not your state meets any or all of the recommended guidelines in a specific area.

Guidelines for High Schools are available in these areas:
 

These graphics are relatively easy to understand and allow you the option to click on your specific state and “drill down” to the specific policies that may or not be in place.  For example, if you’re interested in understanding more about heat acclimatization guidelines be sure not to scroll past the summary information to get to the interactive map.  This summary information clearly delineates the research supported KSI recommendations (which you’ll need to know to understand the map).  Once you know the recommendations go ahead and see how you’re state stacks up to others based on the overall graphic.  If you want to know the specific recommendations your state meets, click on your state to learn more.

 If you want to be an advocate for your state and get all KSI recommendations supported, KSI is willing to work with individual states to get guidelines in place, if it’s not already happening.  There are many states that do not have all the recommendations in place at the high school, so there is work to be done.  Ultimately, I would love to see these guidelines be required with youth sport organizations as well.


NATA SAFE SPORTS SCHOOL:


The Safe Sports School Award is a recognition program initiated by the NATA in March 2013.  A review of the application packet delineates all the guidelines for being designated as a 1st team or 2nd team school.  First team schools meet all recommendations, while second team schools only meet required recommendations.  The list of requirements include:
 
 
 
  • Create a comprehensive athletic health care administrative system
  • Provide or coordinate pre-participation physical examinations
  • Promote safe and appropriate practice and competition facilities
  • Plan for selection, fit, function and proper maintenance of athletic equipment
  • Provide a permanent, appropriately equipped area to evaluate and treat injured athletes
  • Develop injury and illness prevention strategies, including protocols for environmental conditions
  • Provide or facilitate injury intervention
  • Create and rehearse venue-specific Emergency Action Plans
  • Provide or facilitate psychosocial consultation and nutritional counseling/education
  • Educate athletes and parents about the potential benefits and risks in sports as well as their
  • responsibilities
 
The application clearly delineates what each of these concepts include and of those which are required and which are recommended.  The NATA does not dictate how the school and/or district works to meet these requirements outside of utilizing current position statements to develop relevant policies and procedures.  A few other things that you need to about this award program are 1) there is a non-refundable application fee and 2) the application packet clearly states that award designations are made by the NATA, based solely on the information reported by the school.  There is no submission of supplemental documentation or on-site verification required.  As an individual professional I would like an additional verification process, but that does not mean the award is not a useful designation when it comes to understanding the level of commitment to athlete safety at your child’s high school.
Once you understand where you’re state, league and high school stands on these safety recommendations you become better prepared to protect your children during sports participation.  It is always important to follow up with your school and understand how specific policies are executed beyond the general recommendations delineated here.  The ability to execute these policies and procedures in an emergency is what truly protects athletes.  Proper execution requires regular review and hands-on practice of policies and procedures. 
So, does your school meet the recommended guidelines?  Are the relevant emergency procedures practiced regularly?  If you can answer “yes” then your child is participating at a safe school.  If the answer is “no”, it doesn't mean your child's school is completely unsafe, it may means there is still some work to do.  What are you doing to make things better?

Heather L. Clemons, MS, MBA, ATC

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Condition Highlight: Commotio Cordis

The calendar has turned to January bringing a new year and the beginning of spring sport seasons for many (especially at the college level).  As colleges ramp up for the start of softball, baseball and lacrosse seasons high school and youth seasons are not far behind.  These sports along with field hockey, ice hockey and other sports that use high-velocity, low mass balls (as compared to football, basketball and soccer balls) can put youth athletes at risk for certain injuries.  Eye injuries can be more common in this sports where protection is not required (think some racquet sports too), but there is also concern for commotio cordis.  Commotio cordis is a rare and potentially fatal cardiac condition that is the result of a blow to the chest by a blunt object.  Today’s post is going to highlight some of the basics of this condition.

UNDERSTANDING COMMOTIO CORDIS
Commotio cordis (CC) is a condition that can lead to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) as the result of a blunt trauma (blow) to the anterior chest.  This blow results in a ventricular arrhythmia and ultimately death.  It is different than other cardiac conditions that can lead to SCA because it is not the result of an undetected electrical anomaly in the heart.  CC is an extremely rare condition because the precise nature of events that must occur to lead to an arrhythmia.
 
For CC to result a potential victim must be struck directly over the left ventricle of the heart during the upstroke of the T-wave of the heart rhythm.  In other words, there is an extremely small window in which the ventricular arrhythmia will occur.  You must be struck in the chest over the heart during a specific point in the heart rhythm.


Heart rhythm graphic:  Understanding wave parts

 



Current statistics show about 20 events annually on the national registry, but there is some belief that there is some underreporting due to poor recognition and underreporting.  Other statistics include:

  • 80% are white
  • 95% are male
  • 10-18 year olds are most susceptible with 75% under 18 and 26% younger than 10
  • Survival rates have increased from 10 to 58% thanks to increased availability of AEDs in recent years

If you’re reading this wondering what prevention steps you can take, check out the Korey Stringer Institute (KSI) link.  The following resources are some of the most useful in understanding the condition and recognizing it. 

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES






 

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Rubber Crumb Safety: EPA "Steps Back" From Previous Statements


As I do on an almost daily basis I scan the news for interesting stories that relate in some way to sport safety.  A story that caught my attention as we were all preparing for the holidays was research published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) discussing the safety of the recycled rubber used as part of the infill on  many athletic fields, putting greens, parks and other outdoor spaces.  These artificial fields are often referred to as “Field Turf”.  Field Turf ® is actually the name of a leading company that designs and constructs many of the artificial fields that use plastic grass (fiber), sand and recycled rubber tires to construct many of the natural grass-like fields utilized on a daily basis.  According to information on its website it has installed over 7,000 fields (15,000 total projects) and considers itself, “the safest, longest lasting, and highest performing artificial turf system available.”   These artificial turf systems came to be after the concerns that initial attempts at artificial surfaces (think 1966 Astrodome) were actually increasing the number of injuries (especially knee) to the athletes that played on them.  While it appears that these new systems have decreased orthopedic injuries to some degree there are still questions regarding the safety of the small rubber pellets (aka crumb rubber) used in the system generated from recycled tires.  The EPA addresses previous study results these rubber pellets.

UNDERSTANDING FIELD TURF CONSTRUCTION:
According to FieldTurf® a solid system includes fiber, infill and backing.  A video on their website can help you understand how these components work together to create a more realistic artificial surface.  The fiber is the component of the field that looks like grass, but is intended to be more durable and reduce skin friction common with artificial surfaces.  The backing is what allows the fibers to be connected in rows and helps the surface maintain its integrity.  The infill, the area of focus of the EPA study, is most often a combination of sand and rubber pellets that is worked into the spaces between the fibers.  The ratio of sand to rubber is adjusted depending on the desired field performance characteristics.

FieldTurf® states that their patented infill system is what makes the difference in safety (injury reduction), durability, drainage and performance as compared to other artificial field systems.  It is not the within the scope of this post to discuss the drainage, durability and orthopedic safety of these systems.  According to FieldTurf® there are two parts to the infill:  silica sand and cryogenic rubber.  These two components are layered in specific way (see website) to create appropriate performance characteristics.  The top most layer of field turf is large cryogenic rubber pellets.  These rubber pellets are created from recycled tires that are cryogenically frozen and turned into granules.  They account for 30% of the total weight of the infill, approximately 216,000 pounds of rubber for a typical field.  

CURRENT HAPPENINGS:
The EPA was recently in the news around the topic of crumb rubber (the rubber used as part of infill on most synthetic fields) because it was asked to retract comments it made regarding the safety of crumb rubber based on 2009 research study.  Citing results from the 2009 study, the EPA assured consumers that crumb rubber was safe despite finding trace levels of lead and other chemical compounds in the crumb rubber.  As of December 2013 the EPA has now updated its website and crumb rubber fact sheet to more accurately reflect that it is unsure of the effects of the chemicals in crumb rubber on children.  The EPA has also made clear that more research is needed.  Review of the updated information includes an extensive list of compounds in crumb rubber that includes acetone, arsenic, benzene, nickel, latex, and lead among others.  I encourage you all to read these updated statements to better understand what crumb rubber is.  As a precaution the EPA states,Both the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that young children wash their hands frequently playing outside and before they eat.  The EPA also recommends these practices.”

There are many other resources out there that come down on both sides of the debate regarding crumb rubber.  FieldTurf® has compiled this report that says it includes independent research to support the safety of crumb rubber.  The New York State Department of Health has a fact sheet (as do many other states).  Other sources for you to review in order to get a fuller picture of the debate include:


In the end, as with any safety issue that affects our children each parent must make a choice they are comfortable with.  Field installation companies continue to tout the safety of these fields and the studies on crumb rubber continue in efforts to have more conclusive results in one direction or another.  Finally, there are towns that have taken matters into their own hands and fought to have fields and playground components that include crumb rubber removed.  It’s not my place to tell you where to come down on this issue, but as always to help you educate yourself on the issue and let you decide.